What's up with ACT-UP?  

One of the groups raising questions about the validity of HIV testing and the relationship of HIV to health is ACT-UP San Francisco.


Table of Contents

  1. Who is ACT-UP/SF?
  2. How can I contact them?
  3. Why question HIV and AIDS?
  4. Don't HIV drugs help?
  5. What is AIDS?
  6. Now what do I do?
  7. ACT UP's supporters!

Who is ACT-UP/SF?

ACT-UP/SF is a diverse group of individuals committed to ending the AIDS scam through direct action and education. ACT-UP/SF takes no government grants or money from pharmaceutical companies. Although many of ACT-UP/SF's members may have originally subscribed to the belief that HIV causes AIDS, the illnesses that are called AIDS have never been proven to have been caused by HIV. Therefore ACT-UP/San Francisco calls for a re-evaluation of HIV tests and the nature of the AIDS defining conditions, their causes and (possible) treatments. Because of their unusual stand on HIV and AIDS, ACT-UP/SF has often come under fire.

see MEDIA STORM!

ACT-UP SF slams Slingshot

However, ACT-UP is not alone in their thinking, and, thankfully, more people join the AIDS "dissident" movement everyday. Check out the alternative AIDS websites on the main page - What Is AIDS? and the AIDS LINKS page.

Back to Top


How can I contact them?

You can call ACT UP at 415-864-6686. Or you can email ACT UP at actupsf@hotmail.com Find their website at actupsf.com

More information about the status of the ACT-UP medical marijuana dispensary as it becomes available.

Back to Top

Why question HIV and AIDS?

There are simply too many valid questions about what the test results mean and what exactly AIDS is. AIDS isn't one complicated disease but a group of 29 old illnesses and conditions, ranging from yeast infections to different forms of cancer and pneumonia. All of these conditions occur in people who are not HIV positive. HIV tests look for antibodies, not a virus, and many factors can cause a person to "cross-react" or have a positive reaction, such as pregnancy, having the flu, being malnourished, doing a lot of drugs(pharmaceutical drugs and street drugs) or simply living in a toxic environment. Because HIV tests are not conclusive, a survey is always given to determine the patients' "risk factor," so if a test comes back inconclusive and you are a gay man, a prostitute, a person of color or an injection drug user, the test will more than likely be called "positive." If you are an old heterosexual person who has only had one partner, or an affluent white person the test is more likely to be called "negative." Tracking who patients are makes sense, but why take this information *before* a diagnosis is made? Why does it matter what race a person is? Some tests, such as the "viral load" test, are not approved by the FDA but are used as diagnostic tools. There has never been a successful isolation of HIV and it cannot be duplicated in a lab like true viruses.

Many of the treatments available for people determined to be "HIV positive" have been hurried through "fast-track" clinical trials and may cause fatal rashes, fat redistibution, strokes, heart attacks, kidney and liver failure. Money raised for AIDS service organizations often go for six-figure salaries. Therefore, because of the unreliability of HIV testing, the toxicity of HIV drugs, and the fact that HIV has never been proven to cause AIDS, ACT-UP/SF demands accountability from the pharmaceutical industry and the many people who have built careers around AIDS. They also demand an end to useless animal research for AIDS, arguing that there are many poor sick people who could benefit from the billions of dollars raised annually through housing, nutritional programs and other health services.

Back to Top

Don't HIV drugs help?

Many of the drug "cocktails," or "combination therapies" touted as cures contain AZT, a toxic drug shelved earlier because of horrendous side effects... These drugs are being given to pregnant women, even though they often cause life-threatening birth defects. Every person taking these drugs is participating in a clinical trial, because the full range of side effects is not yet known in these experimental drugs. Most have been approved for human use in a "fast-track" program especially set up for HIV/AIDS treatments, even though usually drugs must go through animal testing first. I call it iatrogenicide (doctor-induced death). Some patients may notice a steroidal effect for a while when taking these pills, some are also given testosterone to counter the wasting effects. People with parasites or fungal infections may feel a brief bloom of health. However, the healthy feeling doesn't usually last long, because metabolism of a person taking these drugs is no longer normal. Some people taking them begin to have fat redistribution in their bodies. Some will eventually have stick-thin arms and legs and huge distended bellies. Other people lose the fat from their faces or get big humps on the back of their necks. Life threatening rashes, strokes, liver failure and heart attacks are common in people taking AIDS drugs. This is not health care, not medicine, not research. It's mutilation...

Back to Top

What is AIDS?

AIDS is a category, not a disease. Billions of dollars have been spent on AIDS, more than any other health problem in history. In the 1970's some down and out virologists looking for a career decided to try to find a viral cause for cancer. Failing that, they turned their attention to the new "epidemic" coming out of the clubs in the 1980's. These virologists, particularly Robert Gallo, claimed that health problems caused by a new drug craze, inhaling "poppers," was a new kind of contagious pneumonia, and the seeds of hysteria were planted. Instead of going through standard scientific channels to see if it was true, Gallo announced at a ress conference that HIV was the probable cause of AIDS. This had never been done and is quite improper. This kind of irregularity can be seen again and again with HIV and AIDS, and logic seems to fly out the window. Although the original "AIDS defining" illnesses began as only pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma, a skin cancer, the definition exploded and suddenly there were 12 illnesses, including herpes. Nevermind that these illnesses were around BEFORE AIDS... As years went by, more and more illnesses and conditions were called AIDS. Now there are 28 illnesses and one non-illness, a blood marker, that are called AIDS. Many of these illnesses are not fatal, but the drugs given to people diagnosed as having AIDS can cause horrible deaths. Some call AIDS lazy healthcare, because once a person is said to have AIDS, anything goes. The patient is treated pretty much like anyone else who is given an AIDS diagnosis. Since the doctor presumes that the patient has a fatal disease, it makes it okay somehow to prescribe drugs that would NEVER be given to people expected to live full lives. That is unacceptable in cancer and it's unacceptable when it comes to AIDS.

The illnesses being called AIDS in Africa have been around for a long time, but when you categorize their health problems as AIDS, suddenly lots of research dollars come rolling in. Too bad none of the money goes to people who are genuinely ill. What comprises an AIDS diagnosis in Africa varies from place to place, but most of the people who are said to have AIDS have malaria, tuberculosis and measles. There are only four symptoms required for an AIDS diagnosis in many parts of Africa: rapid weight loss, diarrhea, fever, and a persistant cough. Because HIV testing is not even used in most of these places, it's ludicrous to call these cases AIDS. Even if you believe that people do have AIDS in Africa, what sick people there need desperately is clean water, nutritious food, places to work and a clean-up of the toxic messes that Western industry has left behind in their greedy grab for African resources, not toxic drugs that need precise dosage monitoring. In this country, millions of people are rethinking the treatment regimen suggested by the drug companies. Many of us have seen our (formerly) healthy friends become sick after beginning these anti-retrovirals... It's time to set the record straight.

Back to Top

Now what do I do?

Read everything- there are more and more websites about HIV and AIDS by the people rethinking all of it. There are books and articles you can read that will help you to make your own decisions about your health, your sexuality and most importantly, your life and how you want to live it. The best thing to do is to keep an open mind when it comes to AIDS. Pay close attention to WHO is saying WHAT. If all your information about HIV and AIDS comes from the government or your doctor, it's time for you to do some independent research!

Learn about non-toxic ways to feel better, such as a healthy diet or an exercise regimen. Find out about the health benefits of living (raw) foods and learn relaxation techniques. If you use tobacco, stop smoking immediately because you deserve to be healthy.

What about condoms? There are plenty of reasons why someone might want to use condoms... to prevent pregnancy, to avoid herpes or other illnesses that we believe to be sexually contracted, and - this is my personal belief - a receptive partner can be adversely affected by drugs or other chemicals someone has taken or eaten. In any case, it's probably wise to ask somebody to use a condom when you don't know their general health or habits.

If you're drinking a lot or taking a lot of drugs, all the condoms in the world won't protect you from getting sick. Take care of yourself. Love yourself. Don't let someone pressure you into having sex if you really aren't interested.
Back to Top

ACT UP's supporters!

In response to a hate campaign against ACT-UP SF - launched by a few people in San Francisco calling themselves "AIDS Activists Against Violence and Lies"- a good friend, Steven Keller wrote this letter to the Bay Times, a gay newspaper. Bay Times Mar 2001

Check this out: Celia Farber gives ACT-UP the thumbs up. ACT-UP gets radical

Here is an article by Laurie Garrett of New York Newsday, in which South African Deputy President Jacob Zuma mentions ACT-UP/San Francisco in a most flattering light... reporter Garrett seems unconvinced, however. Newsday, April 2000

See an article about Clinton Fein and the editorial from his website about David Pasquarelli and Michael Petrelis.

Visit this page about "AIDS dissidents," and visit the archives for more articles.